FISCAL YEAR 1996-97
 

DEPARTMENT: State Police
FORM 1: JUDGMENTS PAID BY THE STATE
NAME OF CASE AMOUNT PAID INTEREST FUNDING SOURCE LOCATION SUMMARY 
OF CASE
Nemeckay v Rule, et al $3,479.01 $389.01 General Fund Macomb Defendant arrested and handcuffed Plaintiff for OUIL. Plaintiff claims he told Defendant that the handcuffs were too tight, causing injury and that the Defendant refused to relieve the pressure of the handcuffs.
Clark v MSP 90.00 0.00 General Fund Delta Plaintiff claims he requested information under FOIA and that the Defendants responded claiming exemptions.
FY 1996-97 TOTAL: $ 3,569.01 $389.01
 
 
FISCAL YEAR 1996-97
 

DEPARTMENT: State Police
FORM 2: SETTLEMENTS PAID BY THE STATE
NAME OF 
CASE		 AMOUNT PAID INTEREST FUNDING 
SOURCE		 LOCATION SUMMARY 
OF CASE
Flannery v MSP $10,000.00 $0 General Fund Bay Plaintiff had a heart attack while on duty and claims that the Defendants refused to return him to active duty because of his handicap.
Boisture v Service 110,000.00 0 General Fund Wayne Defendant stopped Plaintiff for a traffic violation. Plaintiff has two artificial knees and claims the Defendant used excessive force during his arrest and he was in Defendant's custody.
Armament Systems v MSP 27,500.00 0 General Fund Statewide Plaintiffs claim the Defendants are infringing on their patent of the PPCT expandable batons and Plaintiffs want the Defendants to be permanently enjoined from infringing on their patent.
Foster v Piziali & Poleski 25,000.00 0 General Fund Jackson Plaintiff worked at prison, was investigated by Defendants and claims that as a result of false information, lost job.
Reaves v MSP 200,000.00 0 General Fund Genesee Plaintiff claims the Defendants took race into account when they promoted a black male to sergeant and that he complained and as a result, Defendants retaliated against him.
Dozier v Fisher, et al 30,000.00 0 General Fund Macomb Plaintiff claims he was assaulted during a false arrest and that MSP failed to take corrective action against an officer who has a penchant for using excessive force.
Rought v Porter 300,000.00 0 General Fund Van Buren Plaintiff, a SWET member, while conducting a narcotics investigation was shot by the Defendant, also a SWET member.
Shulick v MSP, et al 83,500.00 0 General Fund Ingham Plaintiff didn't graduate from two recruit schools, claims discrimination.
Conn & Stybel v Pegouske, et al 15,000.00 0 General Fund Monroe Plaintiff claims the Defendants harassed, assaulted, and falsely arrested her at the Burger King drive-thru for no apparent reason.
LCH Communications, Inc., d/b/a WOOD TV 8 v MSP 4,000.00 0 General Fund Kent Plaintiff requested public documents under FOIA and claims that the Defendants have neither granted their request to view the documents nor issued a written notice denying their request.
Swieczkowski v Kaiser, et al 20,000.00 0 General Fund Macomb Plaintiff's fiancee quit her job because she claimed sexual harassment. Plaintiff claims that the Defendants were provided with false information which lead to Plaintiffs being arrested and jailed.
Rogalle v Bartz, et al 37,500.00 0 General Fund Saginaw Plaintiff was assigned to BAYANET and claims she resigned after pressure from Defendants because she had complained about being sexually harassed and nothing was done about it.
Murray Brown v Margosian, et al 6,000.00 0 General Fund Oakland Plaintiff claims he was crossing the street during the World Cup celebration in Pontiac when the Defendants struck him from behind, beat and dragged him to the curb without provocation.
Doran v Northern Mutual, et al 1,000.00 0 General Fund Houghton Plaintiff's home burned down and he claims the Defendants charged him with arson and they should have known that the evidence garnered was inadequate to substantiate arson as the cause.
FY 1996-97 TOTAL: $869,500.00 $0